OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Library of COALEX Research Reports
COALEX Research Reports are the products of research and analysis conducted on specific issues relating to the regulation of Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The research is conducted in response to requests for information from State Regulatory Authorities, under a cooperative agreement between the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) and the Interstate Mining Compact Commission (IMCC).
COALEX refers to the Library of Surface Mining Materials maintained by OSM in LEXIS-NEXIS and is a major source for the research.
Each Report includes a list of resources which were sent as attachments to the individual who requested the research. To obtain a copy of the attachments or to obtain any additional information, contact Joyce Zweben Scall by phone at 202-686-9138 or by email at JZScall@aol.com.
COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 335
December 1997
Mike Sponsler, Director
Division of Reclamation
Department of Natural Resources
PO Box 147
Jasonville, Indiana 47438
TOPIC: PREBLAST SURVEY
INQUIRY: The question has been raised in Indiana as to what types of structures require preblast surveys. A gas development company has requested a preblast survey on an inactive gas well located on a mineral lease adjacent to an active permitted mine site. As a consequence, Indiana would like to know the following regarding interpretations by other state programs:
SEARCH RESULTS: Eight IMCC member states responded to the survey. The results of the survey appear as an attachment. Also attached are several Federal Register notices; these include: (1) the federal preamble to the final regulations (30 CFR 816.62 Preblast survey); (2) OSM's decision to deny a petition for rulemaking which had recommended expanding the distance that an operator must notify owners of dwellings and structures from « to 1 mile; and (3) preambles to OSM approval of amendments to state programs.
ATTACHMENTS
Research conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall
TABLE OF RESPONSES
1. Does your agency require preblast surveys on oil or gas well heads? If yes, what specifically is required to be part of the survey? Are preblast surveys limited to the visible surface features?
| STATE |
ARE SURVEYS REQUIRED? |
EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
ARKANSAS |
NO |
If the oil/gas heads are within 1000 feet of a structure, the agency will notify people that they could ask for a survey. Arkansas regulations do not require a survey |
ILLINOIS |
NO |
Our regulations state: "...owners of structures located within [1/2] mile of the permit area how to request a preblast or condition survey....Structures such as pipelines, cisterns, wells and other water systems warrant special attention such as the review of construction, drilling or completion specifications; however, assessment of these structures may be limited to surface conditions." The Department by regulation will not allow blasting within 100 feet of facilities including, but not limited to, disposal wells, petroleum or gas storage facilities, municipal water storage facilities, fluid-transmission pipelines, or water sewage lines. |
MISSOURI |
NO |
Missouri considers oil or gas well heads as "structures" which are eligible for preblast surveys. "Structures" are by technical definition all items constructed on property within [1/2] mile radius of the blasting site. Because Missouri's rules state that the survey may be limited to an assessment of the surface conditions or other readily available data, we would not require an assessment beyond the surface (or visible) conditions or other readily available data. In other words, the surveyor would be required to assess the structure through visual observations only as opposed to, for example, also probing, uncovering, sounding, or testing the structure. If data on the condition of the structure was readily available, we would require the operator to present the data as part of the survey. However, the operator would not be required to attest to the accuracy of the data. |
OHIO |
NO |
Our agency would require a preblast survey of an oil or gas well and its associated structures if requested, in writing, by the owner. However, no utility company (electric, telephone, TV cable, oil and gas company, etc.) has ever requested a preblast survey. If one were requested, "...the assessment of these structures may be limited to surface conditions and other readily available data." as stated in our administrative rules. No interpretation of this requirement has been necessary, to date. |
OKLAHOMA |
NO |
We require the operator to give the owner of the structure the opportunity to request a preblast survey. We do not formally review the survey. If presented a copy of the survey, we provide comments that may make the survey more complete and adequate. The extent of the survey is at the discretion of the operator. A detailed survey will provide a greater degree of protection for the operator and owner of the structure. |
PENNSYLVANIA |
NO |
|
VIRGINIA |
NO |
The Division of Mined Land Reclamation (DMLR) requires preblast surveys on any structures within the [1/2] mile radius when a timely request for the survey is made by the owner of the structure or by the residence of an occupied dwelling [816.62(a)]. DMLR only requires that the survey include the visible surface features. DMLR has not developed any specific survey criteria for a specific structure such as a well head. |
WEST VIRGINIA |
NO |
Oil and gas wells are considered structures by this state. If requested by a resident or owner within [1/2] mile of the permit area, the operator shall conduct a preblast survey in accordance with 6.8.a.2 of the regulations. |
2. Does your agency require preblast survey notification to parties who have only a lease hold interest? For the preblast survey requirement to apply, does it make a difference whether the leaseholder "owns" the structure?
| STATE |
IS NOTIFICATION REQUIRED? |
EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
ARKANSAS |
NO |
Arkansas regulations do not require notification; notification is at the discretion of the agency. Leaseholders who get proceeds from the production of oil/gas from the well onsite would be notified; therefore, it would not matter if they owned the structure. |
ILLINOIS |
NO |
The Department requires a preblast survey upon written request by a resident or owner of a dwelling or structure that is located within [1/2] mile of any portion of the permitted area, or by the owner of a dwelling or structure at a distance greater than [1/2] mile from the permit area but within one mile of the blasting area and within an area determined by the Department to be appropriate in a particular situation. |
MISSOURI |
NO |
A survey would be required if requested by a leaseholder who is also a resident or occupant of a dwelling. We would not require a survey if a leaseholder or a dwelling requested a survey on a structure which is not a part of or attached to the dwelling in which he resides. However, the leaseholder may be able to convince the owner of the structure to request the survey |
OHIO |
NO |
Our rule requires notification "...to all residents or owners of dwellings or other structures located within « mile of the permit area...." Therefore, relative to non-dwelling structures such as oil and gas wells, we require that the owners be notified. In fact, since 1986, we have required permit applicants to include owners of such structures (and their addresses) in the [1/2] mile preblast survey notification list. Indiana's specific question about leaseholders has never come up. |
OKLAHOMA |
NO |
We have never had this problem as an issue. However, the determining factor for us is who owns the structure. Lessee, or lessor, is not relevant. The owner of the structure is the relevant issue. |
PENNSYLVANIA |
YES |
Leaseholders will be notified only if they own the structure. Pennsylvania regulations require notice of right to preblasting survey be given to "owners and residents" of structures and dwellings. |
VIRGINIA |
NO |
DMLR does not require notice to those with only a lease hold interest. The rule at 816.62(a) is specifically applicable to the "owners" of structures. |
WEST VIRGINIA |
NO |
|
3. The federal preamble does not appear to limit the types of structures that are eligible for a preblast survey. Does your agency have a mechanism for defining which class of structures require notification and a survey? For example, are such things as fence posts, culverts, portable bins or livestock feeding facilities excluded from the definition of "structures"? If so, how is this interpretation supported -- by statute, by regulation, by policy, by technical determination or some other way?
| STATE |
HAVE REGS FOR DEFINING STRUCTURES? |
EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
ARKANSAS |
NO |
There are no written mechanisms for defining which class of structures require notification. The agency would not be concerned about a fence post, unless it was next to the blast site. The agency might look at the situation if the "structure" was a feeding bin. A "large" structure such as a silo would definitely be eligible for a survey. |
ILLINOIS |
YES |
By regulation, the types of structure that would be considered eligible for a preblast survey are dwellings, public buildings, schools, churches, or commercial or institutional buildings and those listed in response to question 1 above. Illinois does not require a preblast survey on fence posts, culverts, portable bins or livestock feeding facilities. |
MISSOURI |
YES |
"Structures" are by technical definition all items constructed on the property, including portable items. Because Missouri has not yet received requests for surveys which could be considered frivolous, we have not seen a need to further define the types of structures that qualify for surveys. Requests for surveys on structures which experts state cannot be affected by blasting might be considered frivolous. |
OHIO |
NO |
Our agency has no specific mechanism for defining which class of structures requires notification and a survey. We expect that all residents or owners of dwellings or other structures be notified about how to request a preblast survey. If a property had nothing but a barn or hunting cabin on it, we would expect that owner's name and address to be on the « mile preblast survey notification list required at permit application time. |
OKLAHOMA |
NO |
We do not have such a mechanism. Also, we have never had this problem as an issue. |
PENNSYLVANIA |
YES |
Preblasting surveys are always offered to dwellings, public buildings, schools, churches and commercial and institutional buildings. The Department will require preblasting surveys to be offered to owners of any other structure if there is potential for damage from vibration. Such "other" structures could include farm buildings, silos, garages, sheds, bridges and pipelines. Other structures would not include fence posts, culverts or any portable structures. |
VIRGINIA |
NO |
DMLR does not have a definition making distinction between types of structures. The rule at 816.62(a) appears applicable to all structures while 816.(c) seems to make an exception for surveying only the conditions of the surface part of certain structures. |
WEST VIRGINIA |
YES |
Fences and culverts are not considered structures by this state for preblast survey purposes in accordance with 2.116 of the regulations. |